A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst possible neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national interest pursuing an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children household at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier as well as Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has developed into a remarkably publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their loved ones property. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries in their web-site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as such places are matter to demanding controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, significantly inside a delicate coastal environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, that is partially developed, is in the correct place. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, where sights of the sea are the two extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which includes considering the fact that become emblematic in the intensity on the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual evidence with the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become one of the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely observed that such steps ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment during the legal timeline.
At the core of the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as produced, goes past what was approved and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 situations attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is motivated by problem for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal see, insisting in its place that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have described their very long-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically endeavoring to create a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about building of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for your problem that lots of observers see as ever more popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations report about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in local advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from really diverse Experienced backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded through waist-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both of those the Bodily reality with the coastline and the symbolic character from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
As the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom must figure out if the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Specific Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing problems. Yet the human component stays central: neighbours who will have to Reside along with each other extensive following the legal charges have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design performs at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case increase past that deal with. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when elementary challenges like environmental defense and property rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partly developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized queries. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eradicated, or completed as prepared will rely upon the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most carefully viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.